DAMASCUS, SYRIA (10:35 P.M.) – Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi was likely upset about an American assassination attack conducted by US special forces in a desert area of ISIS-held eastern Syria two weeks ago, targeting a close associate of the self-proclaimed caliph.

According to a military source close to Al-Masdar News, US informants and intelligence agencies had traced Abdul Rahman al-Uzbeki for some time, monitoring his movements in the Deir Ezzor governorate.

Abdul Rahman al-Uzbeki, believed to have masterminded a terror attack in an Istanbul nightclub on New Year’s Eve, was shot dead on April 6 as US choppers hunted him down near Mayadin town, deploying elite troops to ensure his death following a brief firefight.

The now deceased jihadist chief, originating from Uzbekistan himself, was also a key facilitator of foreign fighters and funds from private entities flowing to Syria and Iraq.

Remarkably, the US airborne operation took less than 30 minutes and did not result in any casualties for American personnel despite the high-risk mission.

Mayadin, located on the Euphrates River south of Deir Ezzor city, serves as a secondary capital for ISIS due to intensive bombardment on Raqqa, its functioning capital.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  +18 Video | Northern Syria: militant shoots dead his sister for having sex with Turkish officer
Student currently living in Denmark. Special focus on news from Syria, MENA map-making and strategical military analysis.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.