Barring female guards from handling inmates at the US detention facility at Guantanamo Bay poses a “risk” to the soldiers working there, the commander of a top-secret prison unit said.

The commander was testifying at a hearing over a discrimination complaint brought by several women deployed to the remote US base in southeastern Cuba.

The issue flared in November, when military judge Kirk Waits granted an emergency order to temporarily halt the use of female guards in handling detainee Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi.

Lawyers for Iraqi — who faces life in prison on war crimes charges stemming from attacks against US personnel in Afghanistan — have argued that Islam forbids such contact between a man and a woman who is neither his wife nor a relative.

“I’m a devoted Muslim… I believe it’s a sin,” Iraqi said in a written statement read to the military tribunal at Guantanamo, which was monitored by reporters from Fort Meade, outside Washington.

The Obama administration — which has redoubled its efforts in recent months to shut the controversial prison — has asked the tribunal to lift the ban without delay, given the “practical difficulties and far-reaching consequences.”

The commander of Camp 7, whose identity was not revealed for security reasons, said it would be “extremely difficult” to ensure detainee transfers to meet their attorneys and attend hearings without female guards.

“Removing a trained female escort… it is a risk for my soldiers,” said the Army officer, adding he had never been confronted with a “gender-specific order” in 16 years in the military.

One female guard testified she had “never had a problem based on my sex,” even when in direct contact with men in Iraq and Afghanistan.

ALSO READ  Watch: Russian and Egyptian special forces in action

But Iraqi’s lawyer Lieutenant Colonel Tom Jasper insisted on the “cultural and religious differences” at issue, and that “no offense” should be taken by the female guards.

The hearing was to continue Thursday. The timing of a ruling was not immediately clear.

AFP
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.