A powerful Chinese regulator on Wednesday blasted e-commerce giant Alibaba for allowing “illegal” actions on its multi-billion-dollar online shopping platform, accusing executives of narcissism in an unusual government dressing down of a major domestic company.

The State Administration for Industry & Commerce (SAIC), charged with maintaining market order in China, said in an official report that Alibaba’s platforms had hosted “long-standing” violations of online business laws and regulations.

It took aim at Taobao, Alibaba’s consumer-to-consumer platform which is estimated to hold more than 90 percent of the Chinese market, and Tmall.com, believed to command over half the market in China for business-to-consumer transactions.

“Alibaba has not paid enough attention to illegal operations on its online trading platforms or taken effective measures to tackle them… placing itself in the biggest credibility crisis since its establishment,” the SAIC said.

The SAIC has become known for its crackdowns on foreign companies accused of violating China’s anti-monopoly law. But its public dressing-down of such a prominent Chinese firm is unprecedented.

The regulator accused Alibaba of poor oversight of its employees as well as merchants and products on its platforms, disorganised sales management and a flawed rating system for users.

Business magazine Caixin described the SAIC document as a “bombshell aimed at Alibaba”.

Alibaba, founded by Jack Ma in 1999, is China’s biggest e-commerce company. It listed on the New York Stock Exchange last year in the world’s largest public offering to date, which made Ma China’s richest person.

The regulator revealed for the first time that SAIC gave Alibaba what it called “administrative guidance”, a form of official censure, in July last year ahead of the IPO.

ALSO READ  Ready for war? Chinese troops photographed on Indian border with spears

It also explicitly stated that the meeting was held privately “in order to avoid impacting the progress of work before Alibaba’s listing”.

In one of its requests to the e-commerce giant, the SAIC ordered executives to “overcome arrogance”. “In the eyes of the law, there is no special market entity,” it said.

“The holding of the administrative guidance session has… awakened them (executives) from narcissism,” the document said. It did not say whether Ma himself attended.

Taobao let unregistered merchants sell on its platforms, allowed trade in fake goods and failed to manage misleading advertising, the SAIC said.

In a separate survey published last week, the SAIC said Taobao had the lowest rate of authentic goods among a group of six e-commerce companies, with only 37.25 percent of 51 products sampled found to be genuine.

Taobao responded on Tuesday, accusing the regulator of improper sampling for the survey in a microblog post, which was later removed.

On Wednesday, Alibaba said it would take responsibility for cracking down on fake goods, but added it would file a complaint against an SAIC official for “procedural misconduct” in the survey process.

 

AFP

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.