Former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith has claimed that Washington had offered London to use “US assets” to support UK shipping in the Persian Gulf before Iran detained the British tanker Stena Impero.

“I think there are genuine questions to be raised right now about the British government’s behavior, I say this as a supporter of the Government. They were not taken up at the point and I want to know why, with only one ship as it appears there, and no accelerated attempt at assets”, Smith told the BBC.

He called it “a major failure” of the UK government which he said, “has to answer that charge very quickly indeed”.

The statement comes ahead of the UK government’s emergency security session later on Monday, which will be chaired by Prime Minister Theresa May and which is expected to focus on how to retaliate against Iran’s seizure of the British tanker.

Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt is, meanwhile, due to brief Parliament on the matter on Monday as he remains under pressure to join plans by the US to provide an international maritime protection force in the Gulf.

This comes after Defence Minister Tobias Ellwood told Sky News that “it is impossible simply to escort each [UK] individual vessel” in the Gulf.

He rejected allegations that the British government had taken its “eye off the ball”, adding that a “series of options” are being considered by London after Iran’s seizure of the UK tanker.

“If we want to continue playing a role on the international stage – bearing in mind that threats are changing – all happening just beneath the threshold of all-out war, then we must invest more in our defense, including our Royal Navy”, Ellwood said, claiming that the country’s navy is “too small to manage our interests across the globe”.

ALSO READ  IRGC official threatens to destroy Tel Aviv from Lebanon

Earlier, Bob Sanguinetti, the head of the UK Chamber of Shipping, alleged that Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had “clearly violated international laws” when they detained the UK-flagged Stena Impero tanker with 23 crew members on board on 19 July citing a breach of international maritime rules.

Tehran insisted that the Stena Impero’s detention was in response to the capture of the Iranian tanker Grace 1 in the Strait of Gibraltar by UK Royal Marines, in what sparked tensions between Britain and Iran.

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani pointed out that the UK “stole and got a response from the IRGC”.

Tehran also made it plain that the detention of the Stena Impero’s crew, who are mainly from India, will depend on how they would cooperate with Iranian authorities.

Mostafa Kavakebian, a member of the Iranian parliament’s national security committee, for his part, said referring to the Grace 1 that “it is required that the Iranian ship would be released as soon as possible so that we would not have to impose tolls on UK and US ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz”.


Source: Sputnik

Share this article:
  • 1

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.