Any resolution to the fighting in Syria must involve President Bashar al-Assad, the United Nations envoy to Syria has said in the first such acknowledgement by the UN.

“President Assad is part of the solution,” Staffan de Mistura told a joint press conference with Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz in Vienna on Friday.

“I will continue to have very important discussions with him,” de Mistura added, noting: “The only solution is a political solution.”

This was the first time a UN envoy on Syria has explicitly named Assad as part of a peaceful solution after nearly four years of fighting between government forces and rebels seeking his overthrow.

De Mistura’s remarks drew condemnation from the key opposition National Coalition as well as from activists on the ground in Syria.

“I think De Mistura is fooling himself if he thinks that Assad is part of the solution,” coalition member Samir Nashar told AFP by telephone from Istanbul.

“Assad is the problem, not part of the solution.”

Najib Ghadbian, the National Coalition’s UN envoy, described the “brutality” of Assad’s regime as the root cause of the conflict.

United Nations special envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura (C) arrives for a meeting with Syrian deputy Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Minister in Damascus on November 8, 2014

He also warned the US-led alliance fighting the Islamic State group — which has seized swathes of territory in both Syria and Iraq — that its efforts would fail unless world powers get serious about a peace plan for Syria.

ALSO READ  Jordanian army thwarts 2 infiltrations from Syria

“We welcome the coalition but we need to have a comprehensive strategy to address the underlying cause: Assad and Assad’s brutality,” said Ghadbian.

De Mistura, who was in Damascus this week to meet Assad, is due to deliver a report on his mission to the UN Security Council on February 17.

If no solution to the conflict is found, “the only one who takes advantage of it is ISIS Daesh,” de Mistura said, using another name for IS.

The group is a “monster waiting for this conflict to take place in order to be able to take advantage”, he said.

But Nashar disagreed, saying: “If Assad was really interested in fighting Daesh, he would have sent his troops to Raqa rather than to Douma.”

Raqa is the self-proclaimed capital of the jihadists in northern Syria, while Douma is a rebel bastion in the Eastern Ghouta area east of Damascus under a suffocating regime siege for more than a year.

More than 183 people have been killed in near daily bombardment of Douma over the past few weeks, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which said 29 children were among the dead.

– ‘Mass killing in Douma’ –

A picture released by the Syrian Arab News Agency on January 15, 2015 shows Syrian President Bashar al-Assad giving an interview in Damascus

“It appears de Mistura hasn’t heard about the mass killing in Douma,” said Nashar.

An activist from Douma, who identified himself as Mohammed Salaheddin, also dismissed the UN envoy’s assessment.

“Assad can only contribute to a political solution by ordering his army to stop its arbitrary shelling of civilians and by… lifting the siege on Eastern Ghouta,” he told AFP via Skype.

ALSO READ  Erdogan calls for establishment of Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as capital

The activist said Assad should then “give up the position in whose name he destroyed Syria”.

In Vienna, Kurz agreed that “in the fight against IS it can be necessary to fight on the same side” but insisted that “Assad will never be a friend or even a partner”.

Rights groups have accused Syrian government troops of indiscriminate bombardment of civilians in rebel-held areas, including with so-called barrel bombs.

In an interview broadcast this week by the BBC, Assad denied his forces were using the crude, unguided munitions that have been blamed for the deaths of thousands of civilians.

He also complained that in the fight against IS, “there is no dialogue” with the US-led coalition, which began air strikes against IS in September.

“There’s, let’s say, information, but not dialogue,” the embattled leader said.

In a poll on Thursday, 53 percent of residents in opposition-held areas of Syria’s second city of Aleppo — which has seen some of the country’s worst violence since July 2012 — said they favoured de Mistura’s October proposal of a “freeze” in fighting.

But a great majority also said they were sceptical that a truce would hold.

Syria’s war began in March 2011 as a peaceful movement demanding democratic change. It later morphed into a brutal civil war after Assad’s regime unleashed a crackdown on dissent.

More than 210,000 people have killed in the conflict and around half of the country’s population has been displaced.

Several rounds of talks have ended without concrete results.

AFP
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1 Comment
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments