Just as China’s first homemade aircraft carrier, currently known as Type 001A, was sent out for full-scale sea trials this week, Chinese media began tossing around the idea that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs four more.

At the moment, China only has one fully operational aircraft carrier: the Liaoning, which was rebuilt using an unfinished Russian Soviet-era aircraft carrier named Varyag. China built a second aircraft carrier, the Type 001A, on their own, and it is now undergoing tests. The new carrier might be delivered to the PLA-Navy by the end of the year and commissioned sometime within the next two years, the Asia Times reported.

According to the Times, Chinese media outlets are suggesting that the PLA needs a total of six carriers in order to form convoys and strike groups to advance China’s interests in the region. The outlet also indicated that additional carriers would help China to get a handle on “emergencies on several fronts” in a “worst-case scenario.”

A third carrier, the outlet speculated, could be built sometime in the next decade. However, officials have not officially spoken on the matter.

But not every Chinese outlet is pushing the same story — state media publications report that Beijing has no intention of kicking off a “carrier arms race” with the mighty United States, which has a total of 20 carriers.

Wang Yunfei, a Beijing-based naval expert and retired naval admiral, says China doesn’t intend to build as many carriers as has been suggested, stressing that China’s goal isn’t to mirror the US.

“The PLA Navy’s mission is to safeguard China’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and national interests, rather than play ‘world police,'” he said.

ALSO READ  Russia's latest hypersonic anti-ship cruise missile successfully hits target in Arctic (video)

Whether or not Chinese military leaders decide to build more carriers, its team of shipbuilders are ready for the challenge, Hu Wenming, chairman of the China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation, said on state television.

“We have already developed a team of experts in the research, design and construction [of aircraft carriers], and their average age is just 36,” Hu said, according to a South China Morning Post report. “In the future, if the country wants to develop any type of aircraft carrier, we have the capability to do it.”

China’s Type 001A carrier took some four years to build. It’s unclear when the country may start creating another.

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 34
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    34
    Shares
The International News Desk reports on issues and events world wide.

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.