The deadly Paris-style attack in Jakarta has thrown a spotlight on a shadowy Southeast Asian faction of the Islamic State group and offers new evidence of the spread of IS franchises.

Under growing pressure in Iraq and Syria from the US-led bombing campaign, the extremist group is spreading its tentacles, metastasising into new regions.

The IS group already has affiliates in Libya and Nigeria, and has targeted a host of other countries like Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan, using its signature brutality to lure disaffected fighters from other jihadists like the Taliban.

Now, with its claim of responsibility for Thursday’s suicide bomb and gun attacks in Jakarta — which left five attackers and two other people dead — the brutal grouping appears to be getting a foothold in Southeast Asia.

“IS is changing strategy,” said Jakarta police chief Tito Karnavian, the former head of Indonesia’s anti-terrorism unit.

“They are establishing branches of IS across the world — in France, Europe, Africa, Turkey as well as Southeast Asia,” he told reporters this week.

AFP / Bay Ismoyo

Indonesian men accused of having links to the Islamic State group arrive at the West Jakarta court on October 20, 2015

While there has as yet been no direct Katibah Nusantara claim, the group has loomed ever larger on the radar of IS-linked groups.

Its extended name translates roughly as “Malay Archipelago Unit for the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.”

Its goal: a Southeast Asian outpost for its global caliphate.

The faction’s fighters, primarily from Indonesia and Malaysia and who coalesced along shared lines of language and culture, rose to prominence in 2015 after distinguishing themselves on the battlefields of Syria and Iraq, helping to capture territory.

ALSO READ  Turkey transferred 2,500 Tunisian ISIS members from Syria to Libya: monitor

Those victories were a Southeast Asian publicity coup for IS, which trumpeted them in glowing terms on social media in the Malay language, publicity aimed squarely at potential jihadists across the region.

– ‘Jihadi intellectual’ –

Police say Katibah Nusantara is led by Bahrun Naim, who they accuse of orchestrating Thursday’s attacks from Syria, where he is believed to be instructing Southeast Asian militants and organising recruitment.

He has been described in some media reports as a former Internet cafe employee.

Analysts say he was previously imprisoned briefly in Indonesia on suspicion of terrorism involvement, and has been linked with other extremist groups in the past.

AFP / Juni Kriswanto

A group of Indonesian students attend a candlelit protest in Surabaya on January 14, 2016, to condemn deadly bomb and gun attacks in central Jakarta

“He is an active player,” said Joseph Chinyong Liow, an expert on Southeast Asian Islam at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

“He has a website which celebrates IS and its successes, and more specifically, he celebrated the Paris attacks.”

Sidney Jones, a regional terrorism expert, has called him an “ex-prisoner and jihadi intellectual”, saying he was involved in a previous plot last year to carry out an attack in Indonesia, which appears not to have gone ahead.

Indonesia suffered several large and deadly bomb attacks by Islamic radicals between 2000 and 2009, but a subsequent security crackdown weakened extremist networks, and there had been no major attacks for years.

If Katibah is responsible, the Jakarta violence marks its first high-profile strike in its home region, and will challenge Indonesian authorities to once again tame the extremists in their backyard.

ALSO READ  ISIS surprise attack kills several Syrian soldiers in western Deir Ezzor

– ‘Thinking big’ –

“One of the saving graces for Indonesia over the last five years is that local terrorists have thought small,” Jones wrote in a recent analysis of Katibah Nusantara.

“Bahrun Naim and some of his friends think bigger.”

Some fighters from Southeast Asia have returned from the Middle East with tales of disappointment at being given little respect or responsibility there, analysts said.

AFP / Chaideer Mahyuddin

Indonesian anti-terror police participate in a drill in Banda Aceh on August 29, 2015 as the country battles homegrown Islamist militants who oppose its secular, democratic system

But the language and cultural commonalities of Katibah Nusantara followers could help keep fighters in the fold and provide an enduring tool for coordinating attacks across Southeast Asia and recruiting more fighters to Syria, analysts said.

The Islamic State group “is very sophisticated and professional in their militancy, in every sense of the word”, said Liow.

“It does appear to be able to capture and captivate the imagination of many Muslims in this part of the world.”

 

AFP

Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.