For the Syrian people the New Year brings mounting casualties as the civil war moves into its 6th year. The first week of 2016 has been marked by an ever-worse humanitarian situation with reports of widespread starvation in the besieged town of Madaya. While the international community is increasingly engaged in military interventions in Syria, the European community has failed to respond to the new developments that have taken place in the past year.

During the initial phase of the civil war, the leading states within the European Union issued a harsh condemnation of the action of President Assad, with France leading the effort. This was followed up by sanctions on oil exports to Europe, thus heavily impacting the finances of the Syrian government by depriving it of a large part of its export earnings. Meanwhile, France issued a withdrawal of its recognition of Bashar al-Assad in favour of the Free Syrian Army.

The initial resolve has since stalled as the situation has gradually grown ever more complex, with the advent of the Islamic State as a major destabilizing factor. The experiences of the failed military intervention in Libya can explain why the western community has not attempted a similar intervention in Syria, even facing gross human rights violations by the Syrian government and other actors.

Even more important is the internal disagreement within the Union on the topic of Mr. Assad’s role in the Syria of tomorrow. France under Mr. Hollande and his predecessor Mr. Sarkozy staunchly opposes any involvement of Mr. Assad in the peace process, while Germany is not ruling out the possibility of a transitional presidency in the hands of Mr. Assad, albeit together with the moderate rebel factions. This disagreement has prevented the development of any substantial, common European proposals towards the peace process, which would carry a certain weight if put forward.

ALSO READ  Russian Navy tracks NATO ships in Black Sea waters

The European Union must not let their rightful despise for Mr. Assad block their peace initiatives. A peace proposal including the immediate removal of the current Syrian government is doomed to fail in light of Russian and Chinese opposition. As obvious as it might appear, the agreement of these two powers, who both hold a permanent seat in the Security Council, is essential to ensure any UN-sponsored action.

The continuation of hostilities will prolong and intensify as well as broaden the scope of the refugee crisis, as more people undoubtedly will be forced to leave Syria. Estimates for new refugee arrivals to Europe in 2016 lies in the range of 1.5 million, a much higher figure then the corresponding one for 2015. For a European Union whose integrity is currently under pressure from the divide on how to react to the crisis, this prospect highlights the utmost importance of moving towards a comprehensive peace process.

On the short-term the European Union should continue its proud humanitarian tradition. The humanitarian situation in Syria is critical, partly due to a severe lack of funding and an ever-growing number of people in need of aid. The member states of the Union, if they remain resolved in their dedication, possesses the necessary economic capabilities to sustain a humanitarian effort. The delivery of humanitarian supplies would bring the suffering of millions to an end, and even though it provides no actual peace, it will surely enable the people of Syria to sustain their existence until a peace agreement is agreed upon.

In addition, there is a momentum in several countries, especially Denmark, favouring support for aid to the region in order to prevent the massive movement of refugees. It provides the countries of Europe with a crucial opportunity to act after years of relative passivity. The aid, if delivered on a large scale, will serve to stabilize a fragile region by alleviating the sufferings of the millions of Syrian refugees residing in these areas, thereby containing the growth of extremist groups feeding off their plight. Development aid is key to ensuring the future reconstruction of Syria, and will be one of the areas where the European Union can contribute significantly to an eventual peace solution.

ALSO READ  Russian military upgrades strategic bomber Tupolev-22M3M

From this point there is a range of possibilities for a progressive European approach to the Syrian Crisis and towards a peace agreement. Firstly, the European Union can count on two permanent seats in the Security Council, which gives it a position of power in the UN decision-making process. In my opinion this gives the European countries the chance to bring together the warring factions – the United States on the one side, and Russia and China on the other – around a common peace approach. Finally, if all the nations of Europe speaks out with one voice, it might be convincing enough to gather support around an initiative that is European of character, and encompasses the principles of democracy, human rights and liberty.


The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Al-Masdar News.

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Pat
Guest
Pat

This is a foolish and patronising article. And it does not acknowledge the extraordinary good judgement and wisdom of President Assad. Peace initiatives from the EU, France, UK, Germany or the USA can only do harm. This is because all these countries only pretend to have goodwill, so as to deceive their own populations – just as they deceived the writer of this article. Instead these countries have been working to destroy Syria since 2006 or earlier. Some people (like Leith and Ziad) believe the plan to destroy Syria is because of pipelines (oil or gas). This is only partly… Read more »

Victor Lama
Guest
Victor Lama

Strange. Never seen an op-ed piece published without the writer’s name also being published. (Note: I brought this up with site personnel and they let me know it was an oversight, but I decided to just post the comments as I had them prepared yesterday before the site wad fixed.) Anyway, I think the writer oversimplifies things. He talks of “moderate rebel” factions, which we all know full well by now do NOT exist. And nowhere has that particular fact been pointed out more than on this site on so many occasions. And with thousands, if not tens of thousands,… Read more »

News Desk
Admin
Master
Commenter
Rookie Mentor
Upvoted
News Desk

Testing comments

News Desk
Admin
Master
Commenter
Rookie Mentor
Upvoted
News Desk

That seem to work now

barb
Guest
barb

Don’t let our press and government fool you.
MANY SYRIANS DID NOT NOT RISE UP AGAINST ASSAD. The ex British ambassador to Syrian said the Christians, Shias, Alawites, Druze and most secular sunnis support Assad. The USA, Israel, and the Saudis have been trying to destabilize Syria since 2006. Some ways were by funding opposition groups with taxpayer money, promoting the Sunni and Shia divide (our divide and conquer), paying and supporting Jihadists.

James
Guest
James

Stopping Sanctions?Providing Assistance in – food, medical supplies , engineering? Way too logical https://t.co/Gdj67EKejF

CDHVDS
Guest
CDHVDS

what are your thoughts on #Cologne?